https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361687
Randy Barlow <ra...@electronsweatshop.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |limburg...@gmail.com
Flags| |needinfo?(limburgher@gmail.
| |com)
--- Comment #6 from Randy Barlow <ra...@electronsweatshop.com> ---
Hello Jon!
Thanks for fixing the license. The executable names still do not follow the
Fedora guidelines I cited. I'll be a little more specific. The spec file
currently generates these files:
$ ls rpms-unpacked/python2-isort-4.2.5-2.fc26.noarch.rpm/usr/bin/ -l
total 4
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 rbarlow rbarlow 17 Aug 9 14:57 isort -> /usr/bin/isort2.7
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 rbarlow rbarlow 292 Aug 9 14:55 isort2.7
$ ls rpms-unpacked/python3-isort-4.2.5-2.fc26.noarch.rpm/usr/bin/ -l
total 4
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 rbarlow rbarlow 292 Aug 9 14:55 isort3.5
According to the Python packaging guidelines, it *should* be generating these
files:
/usr/bin/isort -> /usr/bin/isort-2.7
/usr/bin/isort-2 -> /usr/bin/isort-2.7
/usr/bin/isort-2.7
/usr/bin/isort-3 -> /usr/bin/isort-3.5
/usr/bin/isort-3.5
In particular, this spec file is missing the dashes and the -2 and -3 symlinks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
