https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366687
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?([email protected] | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> --- Issues: ======= - Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required. Note: Bundled gnulib but no Provides: bundled(gnulib) See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Requirement_if_you_bundle - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. Note: /sbin/ldconfig not called in gnutls30, gnutls30-dane See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries - License text is not installed with %doc or %license - License in spec does not match the actual license (LGPLv2+ - missing '+') - Package bundles libtasn1 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Software_policy - gnutls30-devel conflicts with gnutls-devel The last two are the most important. Bundling policy has been relaxed in later releases, but still bundled libraries need to be identified and justified in the spec file. For the last one I do not know whether it applies or not, a mail to epel-devel could be used to address it. In https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies it says "EPEL packages must never conflict with packages in RHEL Base", however, I'm not sure whether that includes the -devel packages or not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
