https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369244
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #4) > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2) > > (In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #1) > > > Package Review > > > ============== > > > > > > Legend: > > > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated > > > [ ] = Manual review needed > > > > > > Issues > > > ------ > > > - The LICENSE file contains only link to license, not the license text. > > > ASL > > > 2.0 > > > requires that a copy of the license itself is distributed alongside the > > > software. > > > > Upstream it does not provide the original ASL license because as already > > said several times to (Tatu S.) do not want to increase the size of their > > libraries in Android environment > > Adding it to sources won't increase their library size. They just need to > have it in the top directory and not in resources, so it won't end up in > JARs. > > I'm fine with having it as another source before they respond. Yes, i know not realize most of the times I did this, but them (him) do not want -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
