https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264686
--- Comment #16 from Marco Driusso <[email protected]> --- Hi Eric, and thanks for the help. Concerning your comments: - I think gcc-c++ is actually needed as a BuildRequires, since itpp is a C++ library. Otherwise, how can you build without C++ compiler?! I cannot find the exception you mentioned..can you explain a bit more? - It's true that copyright.html is not marked as %license, but itpp-doc already has its own license file (included as %license COPYING). If I include copyright.html in %license, then this will be moved to a different folder wrt the rest of the html documentation, and this will break all the html links referring to it. Given that itpp-doc already has a license file, do you think this is strictly necessary? Meanwhile, I only updated the srpm to f24 and did a fresh scratch build. Spec URL: https://mdriu.fedorapeople.org/itpp.spec SRPM URL: https://mdriu.fedorapeople.org/itpp-4.3.1-1.fc24.src.rpm Successful koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15633052 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
