https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376635

Jon Ciesla <limburg...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |limburg...@gmail.com
           Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org    |limburg...@gmail.com
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla <limburg...@gmail.com> ---
- rpmlint checks return:

ostrichriders.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ostrichriders
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

Nice to have but not critical.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license ( GPLv3+ ) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

So, it's just the things Andrea called out.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to