https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380104
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo <punto...@libero.it> ---
Issues:
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 7 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1380104-python-backports-
functools_lru_cache/licensecheck.txt
All source file are without license headers. Please, ask to upstream to
confirm
the licensing of code and/or content/s, and add license headers
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
https://github.com/jaraco/backports.functools_lru_cache/issues
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
