https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379165
--- Comment #4 from Dridi Boukelmoune <[email protected]> --- > > URL: http://libslz.org/ > Seems to be dead? Quite the opposite, the web site isn't born yet. Upstream's working on it but I put it ahead of time. This is not a widely used project, although it will have its use in Fedora and EPEL with haproxy. I plan to open a bug for that next. If that's a problem, I'll change the URL and update once it's ready. > > Source: libslz-1.1.0.tar.gz > Fix url When I initially submitted this package, archives generated from upstream's git-web were non-deterministic and would conflict with our tooling. Also, once libslz.org is up, source tarball should be published just like I did: a `%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz` archive containing the source tree inside a `%{name}-%{version}/` directory. > Are there any consumers of the static libs, which cannot use shared? > Otherwise drop. Although I'm against bundling in general, I don't see a reason not to ship the static lib in the devel subpackage. I actually asked haproxy's author (same author) not to expect a static libslz when building against it when we were working on making libslz package-able (there used to be no shared lib). I will submit a new spec tomorrow, thanks for reviewing! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
