https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2) > * You are hard-requiring /bin/lsb_release, which upstream says is not > necessary. Please downgrade it to Recommends, as the lsb package has a large > web of dependencies that people may not necessarily want. There is a traceback when the binary is not available. So for now, I want to have there hard requires. I will flip it to Recommends once resolved. > * If you intend to package this for EPEL, you'll need to do a little bit > more work to support Python 3 in EPEL 6/7. For reference, here's a couple of > examples[1][2]. I plan to create only python2 subpackage for el6 and el7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
