https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389016
--- Comment #5 from Dave Love <d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #2) I don't know why I didn't see these myself with fedora-review. Anyhow I'll look into the others, thanks. > - Default compiler flags are not honored. Surely that's not sensible in something like this? I could justify them in the spec file as chosen by Intel for performance. > - libxsmm 1.5.1 is available Only just (!), but thanks for spotting it -- will update. > Can unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings be silenced? I looked into it (and probably should have noted so), and it looked as if probably not, as it seemed the linkage was intentional. I'll try to find that again, though it was in an earlier version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
