https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386938
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Thomas Andrejak from comment #9) > - For soname at the end of the subpackage name, this is what other linux > distribution required, that's why I do it. Yes, but Fedora doesn't work this way. In Fedora, there normally just one version of a given library. Everybody upgrades at once. Hence no suffix. > It make you able to install > multiple libprelude versions in parallel. Do I really have to make only one > subpackage with all ".so" files and do not precise the soname in the > subpackage name ? Yes. > - Can you tell which macro you are talking about ? I think the following macros are unneeded: %global libname libprelude%{major} %global libcpp libpreludecpp%{cppmajor} %global libnamedevel libprelude-devel > - %description is required when you use "%package -n" OK, let's leave that one for later. Instead, please explain the difference between package %{libname} and package %{libcpp} (see how those macros make everything more obfuscated ;)). Is there a reason why the second is not merged with the first? > Thanks for sponsoring :) I will do some reviews this week Great. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
