https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
--- Comment #16 from Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) from comment #13) > where do the so-versioned parts of libEl go? how about the the other shared > objects? > > why do they belong in a devel package? What belongs in the elemental-openmpi > package? there would be nothing left in elemental-mpich/openmpi packages > then. > > Similar to the base package `elemental`. There is nothing there for it. Unversioned libraries (*.so, symbolic links to the versioned ones) go in devel packages. > > > < > rpmlint shows an sqrt 'undefined-non-weak-symbol' warning, the library looks > correctly linked with libm.so. This warning shouldn't be there since library is correctly linked to libm (-lm). > > < > 'unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libElSuiteSparse.so > /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libmpi.so.12' looks wrong, too. > > Do we need to address these issues? I'm not sure they are real bugs, but it's strange that library has an unused dependence against libmpi.so . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
