https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391334
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Link Dupont from comment #2) > Thank you for the review! This raised a couple questions when I was > examining the issues. > > 1) FreeOrion appears to bundle libGiGi > FreeOrion bundles libGiGi. There is an external libGiGi project, but during > my research, I found that Debian supports bundling libGiGi with their > freeorion package. This excerpt from their README.source file: > > Bundled GG (libgigi) library: > At the moment GG is not feasible to maintain separately: > * It is used exclusively by freeorion. > * FreeOrion maintains a fork of GG in FreeOrion's source tree. > * FreeOrion's GG fork is better maintained and needs less patches. > * For example the original libgigi library doesn't build with gcc-4.7 > (requires gcc-4.6) while from FreeOrion's source tree > it builds fine with gcc-4.7 and doesn't need the "vector.patch". > * GG is not a proper library (more like a plugin) and therefore > not suitable for packaging as a standalone libgigi(-dev) package. > > Would I need to submit a bundle library exception to the FPC for this? No; libGiGi is not officially packed on Fedora, it's simply a library provided by freeorion. > > 2) FSF address incorrect > > I noticed a rpmlint warning about an incorrect FSF address. When I looked at > the COPYING file shipped by upstream, it does have the correct address. The > only difference was a comma (,) inserted between the ZIP code and the > country. I feel like ignoring this lint error is okay, since the address is > correct, just formatted funny. Don't modify the FSF address youself, but point out these lacks to upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
