https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398340
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3) > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 52 files have unknown > license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1398340-python- > trezor/licensecheck.txt > > BSD (3 clause) trezor-0.7.7/trezorlib/protobuf_json.py > All source files are without license headers (the one exception to the > above). > Please, ask to upstream to confirm the licensing of code and/or content/s, > and add license headers > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/ > LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification > > [?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. > > trezor-0.7.7/trezorlib/protobuf_json.py http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-json/ > [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. > > [?]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. > > See above > [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. > > Please, add a comment > [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see > attached diff). > See: (this test has no URL) > Diff spec file in url and in SRPM > --------------------------------- > --- /home/gil/1398340-python-trezor/srpm/python-trezor.spec 2016-11-25 > 00:24:18.767221286 +0100 > +++ /home/gil/1398340-python-trezor/srpm-unpacked/python-trezor.spec > 2016-11-24 14:48:27.000000000 +0100 > @@ -57,3 +57,3 @@ > > * Thu Nov 17 2016 Jonny Heggheim <[email protected]> - 0.7.6-1 > -- initial package > +- Initial package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
