https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400



--- Comment #17 from Dave Love <d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk> ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15)
> >SuperLU (and all other supernodal packages) are closer to upstream if they 
> >are 
> > named as they are now.
> 
> I agree. Also, 'repoquery' (or 'dnf') looks be not sensible to capitalized
> names:

Case-insensitive search seems sensible and useful to me.

> repoquery --search SuperLU
>  or 
> repoquery --search superlu
>  
> give same result.
> 
> Ultimately, i vote for SuperLU, SuperLUMT, and SuperLUDIST (like upstream).
> Waiting for Björn opinion.

The author calls it SuperLU_DIST, and I'm Dave Love, not DaveLove.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to