Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630778 Michel Alexandre Salim <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] AssignedTo|[email protected] |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim <[email protected]> 2010-09-15 08:01:47 EDT --- Swap with gedit-valencia ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518892 It should be a straightforward review, but was stalled for months waiting for a new upstream release. - doc subpackage should probably be BuildArch: noarch. Changing it later is a bit painful so you might as well do it now - would it be less complicated to just use the default byte-compiler and then exclude the documentation files? It would involve less macro manipulation, and while it would unnecessarily compile some files, a beneficial side effect is that we make sure the example files are not completely broken. But I'm not too concerned either way. Complete review to follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
