https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411028
--- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity <[email protected]> --- Thanks for your review Alexis. (In reply to Lameire Alexis from comment #1) > Hello, > Please submit a PR to the origiual project for adding the licence header > inside the source and add the request url as comment inside your spec and I > will validate the review. I was wrong about the project license. Since it's a backport of Python 3 (without modification), the code in shutil_which.py is covered by the Python license (as already specified in its header comment... and the LICENSE file). Extra bits (__init__.py, deployment script) are covered by the MIT license, as specified also in the LICENSE file. For these last files, which are trivial, is it really worth adding a license header? Nothing in the MIT license prescribes it. Anyway I will upload a new version of the package with license fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
