https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415331
Raphael Groner <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner <[email protected]> --- Taken. Thanks for looking into bug #1385856. :) Some general hints before I'll run official fedora-review: - Please try to send your patches to upstream: manpage, install and start script. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment - Why does upstream not provide a build/install environment? A proper build script can avoid confusion about right build flags. Maybe we can suggest setuptools. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Byte_compiling - The sitelib folder should be in a separate subpackage python3-enjarify with support for the virtual provides of python-enjarify. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#The_.25python_provide_macro - Manpage is special documentation without the need to be marked with %doc. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Manpages - Please use also install -p for the manpage to preserve original timestamp. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
