Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625602 --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot <[email protected]> 2010-09-20 11:18:17 EDT --- One of the issue here is to determine if libbluray is useful without libaacs and libbdplus, as it would not meet the following guideline : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packages_which_are_not_useful_without_external_bits In others words, are we in a similar situation as for DVDs : libdvread is acceptable while libdvdcss is not. Indeed the commercial bluray discs offering is mostly composed of encrypted discs, and thus useless w/o libaacs and libbdplus. However there are now FOSS BD authoring tool and as such, we'll likely have more and more non-encrypted BDs. This post links to such a BD, made from well known free content (Elephant's Dream and Big Bug Bunny) : http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=328 Just some food for thought when this bug will be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
