https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431444
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1) > - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. > Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages > Hm, upstream has unversioned libraries. So all users will have to be rebuilt > in sync. It would be nice talk with upstream why this is a bad idea. Nothing > you can do downstream though > [https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/msg01155.html]. > Asked to upstream: https://github.com/OpenChemistry/molequeue/issues/17 Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/molequeue/molequeue.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/avogadro2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00528416-molequeue/molequeue-0.8.0-2.20161222giteb397e.fc27.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
