https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436010
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Remi Collet from comment #3) > [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. > Conflicts present for safe upgrade path > > [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > Provides are present. > You could have kept epoch = 2 (raising release to 3) > BTW, this means you will also have to set epoch to 3 in v2 package > Hopefuly, dependent packages should only use composer dep. I was originally going for release 1 on the new pkg, but to be honest, I don't know why :/ I took your advise and bumped the release (4, not 3) and kept epoch 2 in the obsoletes/provides. > => Missing "Obsoletes" in the examples sub-package Added > [x]: Latest version is packaged. > Lastest compatible v1, by design > > > Single blocker, missing obsoletes. Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/8407132e85687b5f7765244b0c42d185bc6cf3c1/php-google-apiclient1/php-google-apiclient1.spec SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/php-google-apiclient1-1.1.7-4.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
