https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297524
Athos Ribeiro <athoscribe...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |athoscribe...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |athoscribe...@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Athos Ribeiro <athoscribe...@gmail.com> --- Hello, I will take this review. - License field is wrong (!!FILL!!) in the new spec. - Version 6 is out, do you want to package it before we proceed (and use the new gofed version to generate the spec file)? - Note that if you are packaging a post release, you should not use the 0.N notation. Also, there are new guidelines on pre/post releases. In special, the date when the snapshot was taken must be in the release tag. See [1] and [2]. - You could also remove the empty conditional blocks to improve readability [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Versioning_Examples -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org