Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605423 Thomas Spura <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected] --- Comment #11 from Thomas Spura <[email protected]> 2010-09-27 08:22:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Thanks for the new package. It looks good, unfortunately the trick with > "%global __find_provides %{_rpmconfigdir}/find-provides | grep -v -E > '_objects.so|_pack.so'" > does not work (independently of "-E"): [snip] > Usually it is suggested to use an external script (see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependencies > ). [snip] > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#private-shared-object-provides > should be fixed as well - I'll write tomspur a separate mail. ;-) I just found a far better way to solve this. There are some macros defined in redhat-rpm-config, see: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/macros.filtering With that you can simply do: %filter_provides_in %{python_sitearch} %filter_setup Which works like a charm! I'll update the wiki to suggest using that instead, because we haven't automatic provides for python (yet), so we can exclude the pythonpath completely. (Might change sometime.) Because this applies to ALL python-non-noarch packages it would be great if this would be defined somewhere in the python macros. This way, no python package needs to do that sort of filtering anymore. (CC'ing Toshio and David for opionions) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
