--- Comment #43 from jiri vanek <jva...@redhat.com> ---
> I have not looked into any of the license issues, it would be great if other
> have time to help me.
I did. Whole fx project should really be GPL2:
Thanx to Mario for pointing out
On other side, it claims to have same license as openjdk;
That is a bit contradiction, so maybe I have bad license in jdk package.
Your statement of:
License: GPL v2 with exceptions and BSD and LGPL v2+ and (LGPL v2+ or
seems to be reflecting major of what review tool is saying. Hoowever I would go
with simple GPL-2 with Classpath exception (/me a bit afraid of BSD in license
The incorrect-fsf-address is actually patch for upstream, so we do not need to
bother with it rigt now.
I will try to find some lawyer around, but with "GPL-2 with Classpath
exception" I think we are ok to go.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
package-review mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org