https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457929



--- Comment #18 from René Cannaò <rene.can...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Augusto Caringi from comment #15)
> (In reply to Pavel Raiskup from comment #12)
> > Per '/usr/share/doc/jemalloc/jemalloc.html':
> > 
> >   opt.xmalloc (bool) r- [--enable-xmalloc]
> > 
> >     Abort-on-out-of-memory enabled/disabled. If enabled, rather than
> >     returning failure for any allocation function, display a diagnostic
> >     message on STDERR_FILENO and cause the program to drop core (using
> >     abort(3)). If an application is designed to depend on this behavior,
> >     set the option at compile time by including the following in the
> >     source code:
> > 
> >       malloc_conf = "xmalloc:true";
> > 
> >     This option is disabled by default.
> > 
> > I'm not sure.  Does that mean that we could build the support for
> > (--enable-xmalloc) into default Fedora package, without actually changing
> > the default behavior?  If yes, bug against jemalloc should be filled and
> > for the time being we could bundle ...
> 
> As far as I understand... Yes. I'll file a bug asking for that.

I am not sure if Fedora should have jemalloc with xmalloc support, as upstream
intentionally has this option disabled by default.

ProxySQL 1.4.x doesn't just enable xmalloc , but also applies a patch for it
because by default xmalloc can hurt performance. See:
* https://github.com/jemalloc/jemalloc/issues/522
* https://github.com/sysown/proxysql/issues/823
*
https://github.com/sysown/proxysql/commit/42a55f750c362299c9f0ed7834cdedc5f9778f47

I asked to apply to patch upstream, but was rejected with a valid reason:
https://github.com/jemalloc/jemalloc/pull/523
https://github.com/jemalloc/jemalloc/issues/522

Nonetheless the patch lives in ProxySQL.


> 
> > > re2
> > >   - patched (from proxysql_notes.txt: Because ProxySQL will process
> > >   regular expression in an already thread-safe environment, re2 is
> > >   patches to remove locking)
> > 
> > Interesting.  Does the locking hurt performance?
> 
> Good question, I didn't measure, but probably yes. 
>  
> > >   - Another reason: proxysql includes a private header file which is not
> > >   present in re2-devel Fedora package (regexp.h):
> > >     // --- SPONSORED LINK 
> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > >     // If you want to use this library for regular expression matching,
> > >     // you should use re2/re2.h, which provides a class RE2 that
> > >     // mimics the PCRE interface provided by PCRE's C++ wrappers.
> > >     // This header describes the low-level interface used to implement RE2
> > >     // and may change in backwards-incompatible ways from time to time.
> > >     // In contrast, RE2's interface will not.
> > >     // 
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > I think it is fair to bundle too .. to not prolong the review too much, but
> > we
> > should have new bug for this issue.  It seems to me that the ./configure
> > script should have additional option "disabling" the "patched" version of
> > re2.
> 
> Right, but the project uses just Makefiles (no Autotools).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to