https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821406
--- Comment #54 from Raphael Groner <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #53) > 1. I should make this? > License: GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and BSD I fail to see why LGPLv2+ is needed. All kinds of mentioned GPL versions of the source files can be merged into GPLv3+. Please ensure that BSD is also noted as we've some files licensed with different BSD variants. It's necessary to add "BSL" or "Boost" (boost license) as well. Sorry, I've overlooked that, it's all mentioned in the summary of f-r: [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "BSL (v1.0)", "BSD (3 clause) GPL (v3 or later)", "BSD (3 clause)", "BSD (2 clause)", "GPL (v2.1) LGPL (v2.1)", "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2)", "*No copyright* GPL (v3 or later)", "*No copyright* GPL (v2)". 1203 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/builder/fedora- review/821406-eiskaltdcpp/licensecheck.txt https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses > 2. If I run eiskaltdcpp-qt it start with my (russian) locale. What do you mean > about "locales for the qt subpackage"? Okay, thanks for clarification. It was somehow confusing. > 4. Requires: perl will be added. Thanks. > 5. Noarch subpackage will be created. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
