https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341
--- Comment #45 from Charalampos Stratakis <[email protected]> --- Hello Vincent and thanks for your work and your patience with the package review. Technically all seems fine now. The package builds and works as expected. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. Just one last item on the list. Please add a comment above the license tag with a small explanation of the licenses breakdown [0]. Also please mention there that the CC-BY-SA is for the documentation subpackage that hasn't been built/shipped yet. [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
