https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443076
--- Comment #37 from jiri vanek <jva...@redhat.com> --- ... > > My point was that we should ask *upstream* whether or not this is > intentional. It's one of the odd balls. Everything else is in conf upstream > already. Thus, we should file a bug/ask upstream whether or not this should > be in conf upstream. That's all that's to do here. Thank you! fired: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2017-August/019587.html > > > Config files in etc. I really wont to move them. However it will not be an > > easy task from point of view of multiple installs and copy-jdk-configs. > > I would like to not block this review on it. I have already started to work > > on c-j-c to support this, but there is still some longer way to go. > > OK. This should be fine. I'm glad to hear this will be worked on. Thank you for trust. And thank you for careful review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
