https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344276
--- Comment #31 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com> --- Links are confusing. The https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/gdeploy/gdeploy.spec file is very outdated. The actual srpm is https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/gdeploy/gdeploy-2.0.2-13.src.rpm Spec from link differs from spec in srpm. Changelog is missing from -5 to -13 in the srpm. From the link jumps to -4 to -13. Tested downloading the src.rpm and running: $ fedora-review -r -n gdeploy I suggest you to install the fedora-review package, and test yourself running: $ fedora-review -b 1344276 This way you can see most if not all details a reviewer will talk about :) * Please update the bug report with matching SRPM URL and SPEC URL. Also make sure src.rpm spec matches spec in SPEC url. * License does not match. There are several GPLv3+ licensed files in the tarball. Apparently, should use "License: GPLv2+ and GPLv3+" File gdeployrest/gdeployapi.py is GPLv3+ with incorrect FSF address. * Documentation should be built with sphinx. Not install sources, e.g. in build have: pushd doc make html popd * Documentation should be in a separate -doc package. It is already large in source format, and will be larger in html format. * Upstream source is not available: https://github.com/gluster/gdeploy/archive/v2.0.2.tar.gz#/gdeploy-2.0.2.tar.gz Latest from github is 2.0.1. * Please either add a %check section and run the script in the tests directory, or give a good reason for not to. Usually, just loading the python files is enough to detect issues on other architectures, or other "random" issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
