--- Comment #14 from Brandon Nielsen <> ---
(In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #13)
> For g++ subpackage, I'd check original gcc, maybe.  Same for gnulib,
> assuming it has also been bundling it. The illegal package name has to do
> with including static files in a package name without -static suffix, which
> is likely not relevant here.
> I'd say pinging someone from the Embedded SIG might be useful:

New spec URL:


I split out the C++ stuff. Original gcc doesn't bundle gnulib, but the bundled
libiberty is not versioned.

I'll check out the Embedded SIG when I get a chance.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
package-review mailing list --
To unsubscribe send an email to

Reply via email to