Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634091 Robert Scheck <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) Flag| |needinfo?([email protected] | |om) --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck <[email protected]> 2010-10-03 14:27:05 EDT --- Fedora Legal might want to correct me, but I don't see a proper licensing in the upstream sources. There is only a pristine LICENSE file containing the Artistic 2.0 license. But none of the source code files contains a licensing header nor can I find a statement telling that the software is Artistic 2.0. Tom, may you enlight us here, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
