https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421055
--- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #7) > Is this package really needed? The diff between gnome's cogl 1.22 and this > fork is just a few commits. Wouldn't it be possible to cooperate with Fedora > cogl maintainers and cogl upstream to upstream those patches and dispose of > the fork: > > Only in deepin-cogl cogl-1.22 branch: > * 1e1e1b8a97 winsys: Disable sync_control > * f28fe60db1 Add LICENSE > * 9ee8ef2d2d (tag: 1.22.3) Change debian dir > * a34f7835c0 Debian dir migration > * 9e113c10da Add debian dir > * d8b34ab060 texture: Support copy_sub_image > * 78636289b0 Add GL_ARB_shader_texture_lod support > > Only in upstream cogl cogl-1.22 branch: > * cbdde65b7e (upstream/cogl-1.22) Add Nepali translation > * 84d9ed33ef Update Malayalam translation > * 811f285a8e Update po/Makevars > * 3baa2d7a65 Updated Norwegian bokmål translation. > * 0bc94d13df Update Friulian translation > * cdb3229f54 Update Friulian translation > * df29d85990 Add Friulian translation > * b583e21d86 Fix an incorrect preprocessor conditional > > @pbrobinson, what do you think? Yes, absolutely, having overlapping libraries is ridiculous. Also looking at the 7 patches in deepin-cogl listed above there's probably only two that actually would affect Fedora, the top 5 listed commits are debian/windows/licence related, it's likely only the bottom two of real effect to Fedora and those should go for review upstream (well they all should). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
