Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637904 Mamoru Tasaka <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <[email protected]> 2010-10-06 08:59:52 EDT --- Thank you! Now only commenting for this: (In reply to comment #5) > Btw, just curious, but do you plan to package ruby-gtk bindings ? Please check bug 639098 and the bugs blocking the bug. I will explain what I am trying to do now. Currently ruby-gnome2 is already in Fedora: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3765 and ruby-gtk2 binary rpm is currently created from ruby-gnome2 srpm. Now ruby-gnome2 upstream also released gems for ruby-gtk2 part from 0.90.0, so for ruby-gtk2 part (i.e. rsvg2 gtk2 pango gdk_pixbuf2 atk) I am going to make rpms based on released gem files, and make rpms generated from ruby-gnome2 srpm obsoleted by gem-based rpm. The rest part (i.e. bonobo2, gconf2, ...) still have to be rebuilt from ruby-gnome2 srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
