https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419271
James Hogarth <james.hoga...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from James Hogarth <james.hoga...@gmail.com> ---
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "BSL (v1.0)", "ISC", "Unknown or generated",
"BSD (3 clause)". 176 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/james/workspace/fedora-
scm/1419271-leatherman/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: <SNIP> # false negative in f-r due to debug package changes
[!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
leatherman-debuginfo , leatherman-debugsource
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: leatherman-1.3.0-3.fc28.x86_64.rpm
leatherman-devel-1.3.0-3.fc28.x86_64.rpm
leatherman-debuginfo-1.3.0-3.fc28.x86_64.rpm
leatherman-debugsource-1.3.0-3.fc28.x86_64.rpm
leatherman-1.3.0-3.fc28.src.rpm
leatherman.x86_64: W: no-documentation
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
leatherman-devel.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib64/cmake/leatherman/scripts/cpplint.py /usr/bin/env python
leatherman-devel.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib64/cmake/leatherman/scripts/cpplint.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_curl.so leatherman_curl.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_dynamic_library.so leatherman_dynamic_library.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_execution.so leatherman_execution.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_file_util.so leatherman_file_util.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_json_container.so leatherman_json_container.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_locale.so leatherman_locale.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_logging.so leatherman_logging.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_ruby.so leatherman_ruby.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_util.so leatherman_util.so.1.3.0
leatherman-debuginfo.x86_64: E: useless-provides debuginfo(build-id)
leatherman-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
leatherman.src:67: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 8, tab: line
67)
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 14 warnings.
Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: leatherman-debuginfo-1.3.0-3.fc28.x86_64.rpm
leatherman-debuginfo.x86_64: E: useless-provides debuginfo(build-id)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
leatherman-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/puppetlabs/leatherman <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or
service not known>
leatherman-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
leatherman-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/puppetlabs/leatherman <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or
service not known>
leatherman-debuginfo.x86_64: E: useless-provides debuginfo(build-id)
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/puppetlabs/leatherman <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or
service not known>
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
leatherman-devel.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib64/cmake/leatherman/scripts/cpplint.py /usr/bin/env python
leatherman-devel.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib64/cmake/leatherman/scripts/cpplint.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_curl.so leatherman_curl.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_dynamic_library.so leatherman_dynamic_library.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_execution.so leatherman_execution.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_file_util.so leatherman_file_util.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_json_container.so leatherman_json_container.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_locale.so leatherman_locale.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_logging.so leatherman_logging.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_ruby.so leatherman_ruby.so.1.3.0
leatherman-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/leatherman_util.so leatherman_util.so.1.3.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/puppetlabs/leatherman
<urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_curl.so.1.3.0 /lib64/leatherman_util.so.1.3.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_curl.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_dynamic_library.so.1.3.0 /lib64/leatherman_util.so.1.3.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_dynamic_library.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_execution.so.1.3.0 /lib64/leatherman_file_util.so.1.3.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_execution.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_file_util.so.1.3.0 /lib64/leatherman_util.so.1.3.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_file_util.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_json_container.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_locale.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libboost_system.so.1.64.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_locale.so.1.3.0 /lib64/leatherman_util.so.1.3.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_locale.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_logging.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libboost_log_setup.so.1.64.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_logging.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libboost_thread.so.1.64.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_logging.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libboost_date_time.so.1.64.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_logging.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libboost_filesystem.so.1.64.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_logging.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libboost_chrono.so.1.64.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_logging.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libboost_atomic.so.1.64.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_logging.so.1.3.0 /lib64/librt.so.1
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_logging.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_ruby.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_util.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libboost_date_time.so.1.64.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_util.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libboost_chrono.so.1.64.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_util.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libboost_system.so.1.64.0
leatherman.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/leatherman_util.so.1.3.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
leatherman.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 42 warnings.
Requires
--------
leatherman-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
leatherman-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
leatherman-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
boost-nowide-devel
cmake-filesystem(x86-64)
leatherman(x86-64)
leatherman (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/sbin/ldconfig
libboost_atomic.so.1.64.0()(64bit)
libboost_chrono.so.1.64.0()(64bit)
libboost_date_time.so.1.64.0()(64bit)
libboost_filesystem.so.1.64.0()(64bit)
libboost_locale.so.1.64.0()(64bit)
libboost_log.so.1.64.0()(64bit)
libboost_log_setup.so.1.64.0()(64bit)
libboost_regex.so.1.64.0()(64bit)
libboost_system.so.1.64.0()(64bit)
libboost_thread.so.1.64.0()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libcurl.so.4()(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
Provides
--------
leatherman-debugsource:
leatherman-debugsource
leatherman-debugsource(x86-64)
leatherman-debuginfo:
debuginfo(build-id)
leatherman-debuginfo
leatherman-debuginfo(x86-64)
leatherman-devel:
cmake(Leatherman)
leatherman-devel
leatherman-devel(x86-64)
leatherman:
leatherman
leatherman(x86-64)
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/puppetlabs/leatherman/archive/1.3.0.tar.gz#/leatherman-1.3.0.tar.gz
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
282bc54ca28e8269a392bbda423b940177a5925246ab961c7a5c338046b51ba0
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
282bc54ca28e8269a392bbda423b940177a5925246ab961c7a5c338046b51ba0
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1419271
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
== Summary ==
It was pointed out to me in the boost-nowide review that %__make should
generally be replaced by %make_build unless there is an issue with
multithreaded builds. On import please test it with %make_build instead of
%__make and if there are any build issues please add a comment to the spec file
explaining.
There's something odd with the autoreq/autoprov and the leatherman libraries. I
don't consider it a blocker but it is a little odd that the libs are not in the
provides, and a package built against this doesn't automatically get the libs
correctly.
Would be interesting to track down why ... but it's food for thought with
dependent packages having a simple workaround of a specified requires for the
time being.
On import please replace the tabs with spaces for consistency.
Since there are no significant issues this package is APPROVED with the caveat
that the tabs are cleaned up on import and that %make_build is tested.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
