https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510877
--- Comment #19 from Petr Pisar <[email protected]> --- I looked at the sources. The situation is this: LICENSE: Artistic 2.0 text lib/LMDB_File.pm: Artistic 2.0 ppport.h: GPL+ or Artistic README: GPL+ or Artistic LMDB.xs: GPL+ or Artistic Makefile.PL: Artistic 2.0 Therefore the tag should be: License: (GPL+ or Artistic) and Artistic 2.0 What license coveres other files like tests under ./t is unclear because README and LICENSE do not agree. I recommend to ask upstream for clarification. But that does not prevent you from packaging this software. The license as expressed in my example is acceptable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
