https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529402
--- Comment #3 from Carl George <[email protected]> --- > Enclose your subpackage like this, otherwise it creates a conflict if python > version is 3 and mock/fedora-review can't process the SPEC: I don't think that is the best approach. It's an EPEL-only spec file that works fine on RHEL/CentOS. The issue you are describing is specific to Fedora. I don't think the spec file should carry extra lines just to make rpmlint happy on an OS that it should never be built for. To parse a spec file like this under Fedora, I think it makes more sense to just use temporary macros definitions. $ rpmlint python3-docker-pycreds.spec python3-docker-pycreds.spec: E: specfile-error error: Package already exists: %package -n python3-docker-pycreds python3-docker-pycreds.spec: E: specfile-error error: query of specfile python3-docker-pycreds.spec failed, can't parse 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. $ echo '%python3_pkgversion 34' >> ~/.rpmmacros $ rpmlint python3-docker-pycreds.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ sed -i '/%python3_pkgversion/d' ~/.rpmmacros For comparison's sake, none of the other EPEL-only python3 spec files for python34 stack contain such a conditional. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
