https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114146
--- Comment #12 from Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Julian C. Dunn from comment #11)
> This all seems reasonable. I updated it to rubygem-ffi-yajl 2.3.1 and
> rebuilt it
There is missing changelog entry, but this is just minor nit.
> Are we good to go on this now?
Well, I am, but since I proposed this, I don't think I am eligible to approve
this.
BTW it would be probably better to have the runtime dependency directly on the
libyajl library instead of the package, i.e.:
~~~
Requires: libyajl.so.2()%{_isa}
~~~
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
