https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546546

Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |NEW
                 CC|                            |heg...@gmail.com
          Component|Package Review              |electrum
         Resolution|NOTABUG                     |---
           Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org    |heg...@gmail.com
            Summary|Review Request: electrum -  |electrum - please update to
                   |updated to version 3.0.6 -  |version 3.0.6
                   |first package need sponsor  |
           Keywords|                            |Reopened



--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> ---
I think it's fair to have this open against the electrum package, though a
patch against the existing spec would be more useful than a whole new spec.  I
did have a conversation on IRC recently with someone who might have been
caravel about this, but I only suggested opening a bug against electrum, not
opening a whole new review request.

Hopefully the current electrum maintainer will see fit to either update the
package (which will also deal with the open security issue) or request that
caravel be sponsored so that they can be made a maintainer and perform the
update.  That request would be made via https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to