https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582861
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa <[email protected]> --- The naming of the packages is somewhat misleading. For example, I expect that if there's vkd3d and vkd3d-libs, that only the latter has libraries. The splits for devel are equally odd. From what I can tell in the source tree, it can actually produce binaries, but the Makefile.am is currently set to not install any produced programs. That's perfectly fine, of course. A suggestion: Produce the following subpackage layout: * libvkd3d - main libvkd3d library * libvkd3d-devel - devel content associated with it * libvkd3d-utils - utility library for libvkd3d * libvkd3d-utils-devel - devel content associated with it libvkd3d-utils would "Requires: libvkd3d%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}" libvkd3d-utils-devel would "Requires: libvkd3d-devel%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}" And as Robert-André Mauchin said, libvkd3d-devel should require libvkd3d and libvkd3d-utils-devel should require libvkd3d-utils in a similar manner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/IALCOYD3YNQWJ56QMLSQRLZHYFNCM5Q2/
