https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416705
Petr Viktorin <pvikt...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |182235 (FE-Legal)
--- Comment #7 from Petr Viktorin <pvikt...@redhat.com> ---
Remove the CC-BY-NC files, and let upstream know that these files aren't [Free
Content], which is complicating distribution of all of Kivy.
[Free Content]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_content
I am not sure if removing them can be done by simply not including them in the
built RPMs, or if you need to remove them from the SRPM as well, as described
here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code
Since I'm not sure, I made the bug block FE-Legal to get someone from the Legal
team to clarify.
The section I linked above says "Some upstream packages include patents or
trademarks that we are not allowed to ship even as source code," so maybe
"Non-Commercial" licenced code is OK to ship in SRPMs? But that reading doesn't
sound right -- are there no *licence* restrictions on SRPMs? I couldn't find
much in the various guidelines. If there are, I believe the "When Upstream uses
Prohibited Code" paragraph should mention/link to them.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7VU2Y7YXOPP3N7GCLEWO565E3UPKXZCO/
