https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597287



--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Dieter <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #5)
> So the licensing is complicated here:
> * It should be BSD and MIT and Public Domain
> * Provides: bundled(buzhash) = VERSION OF BUZHASH

I had to modify the original code, so it can't really be unbundled.  I'll go
ahead and add the provides.

> There seems to be some bundled code about multipart parsing...

There was, but it didn't do what I needed, so I had to start from scratch.  I
obviously forgot to delete the original README.md, so I'll take care of that

> * Provides: bundled(something) = VERSION OF THIS SOMETHING
> * Provides: bundled(sha1) = …
> * Provides: bundled(sha2) = …
> 
> But please, can you unbundle those?

These were bundled to keep dependencies at a minimum because I see zchunk as
having universal use, even in places where openssl might not be available.

Having said that, if you feel strongly about this, I will change zchunk so
openssl is an optional dependency, that, if available, will provide the hashing
functions rather than the built-in hashing functions.

Do you feel that that would be worth the effort?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/CWHSD47G5UPC3VKJZO5MV6DA22HAPKYN/

Reply via email to