https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609038



--- Comment #3 from [email protected] ---
> - Use a more meaningful name for your archive: 
>
> Source0:        https://%{provider_prefix}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-% 
> {version}.tar.gz

That results in the source url no longer being valid and doesn't that go
against the Fedora url guidelines which wants the actual source url?

> - Add a comment above the patch describing why it is needed.

Will fix

> - You should unbundle the dependencies and remove the vendor directory in 
> %prep (might take a while). That implies packaging any missing dependency.

This was recommended to me by one of the package wranglers as well as the cri-o
people until the GO packaging guidelines are finalized

> - It is not ok to apply a patch on some architecture only. The arch detection 
> if needed should be in the patched code itself.

Will fix

> - with_bundled isn't defined anywhere.

Will fix

> There's a new way to package the Go libraries, see 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/More_Go_packaging and samples: 
> https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/golang/
>
> It would be great to convert to the new style for F27-Rawhide and keep the 
> old style for EPEL7.

That looks to be a proposal. Does the draft not have precedence?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/NU4EKNRDE2VUWBLWDS5RN5ZSHOYBM52S/

Reply via email to