https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612092



--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa <[email protected]> ---
@Aurelien, is there a reason that we're doing this instead of just updating
mailman and splitting mailman2 out as an alternate package?

The idea would be that mailman3 would be the default mailman people would
install.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/FLDBPOI4PCPFBOYX34BLL4E5CTW4YK4D/

Reply via email to