Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641093 --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking <[email protected]> 2010-10-31 07:08:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > But: as there are GPLv3+ files in the main package also (I'm referring > to m4/ax_lua.m4) - even if they are just part of the source RPM - which > were not moved to any subpackage, you will have to tag the main package > with "License: MIT and GPLv3+". Sorry, but that's incorrect. The License fields must reflect the license of the *binary* rpm(s). Files that are not packaged (or compiled and linked into a packaged file) don't affect the License field. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License:_field The m4 files are only used in conjunction with the autotools during configuration. Thus, they can be ignored when determining the license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
