https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622122
Raphael Groner <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner <[email protected]> --- Why not use the new sources in lxqt-common? For reasons, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1621317#c2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1621317#c4 What to do if upstream decides to use new project names with another major version bump, again? > The reviewer of the package MUST explicitly acknowledge this fact, > and check the package for the proper Obsoletes and Provides (see the naming > guidelines for more information.) They MUST document in the review request > that they have done so. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process#Re-review_required Please be aware that you would never be allowed to remove the following lines: > # The themes were essential part of the previous lxqt-common package which > # no longer exists. Therefore we obsolete and provide it here: > Provides: lxqt-common = %{version}-%{release} > Obsoletes: lxqt-common < 0.12.0 > # The old name for the theme subpackage was lxqt-theme > Provides: lxqt-theme = %{version}-%{release} > Obsoletes: lxqt-theme < 0.12.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/W4LFOOTUNUHWTPUGQAUJSRSIB7ETQHQP/
