https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915
Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Assignee|mhron...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #23 from Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> ---
My resistence is based on a fact that you are trying to workaround what I see
as a no-problem and that you are diverging from upstream.
No, there is no rule that you cannot remove one part of upstream software and
replace it with something else because you think it's better. However I always
though that this is something that is discouraged in Fedora and all our
downstream changes must be highly justifiable, or on it's way to upstream.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Staying_close_to_upstream_projects
If you are unwilling to accept this, I am unwilling to accept the package and
am stepping down form the review. I guess there will be others who are not so
prudent.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
