https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612092
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Aurelien Bompard from comment #5) > Sorry for taking so long to reply. Indeed the mailman 2.x package is going > to stop working in Fedora pretty soon, with the end of Python 2, so it would > make sense to rename mailman to mailman2 and mailman3 to mailman. > > I started with mailman3 because of EPEL, I expect mailman2 to be available > there for a while. Plus since it's a new package, it's easier to not have it > depend on the renaming of another already included package. Let's review > this one first, make sure it's correct according to the guidelines, and > discuss with the mailman2 maintainer what we want to do then. Would that > work for you? Suggestions? Sounds good to me. We'd probably want to prepare a Self-Contained Change to switch mailman package to mailman 3 for Fedora 30. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
