https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647145
--- Comment #2 from Marcin Ślusarz <marcin.slus...@intel.com> ---
(In reply to Dan Williams from comment #1)
> Why the usage of:
>
> %global debug_package %{nil}
>
> ...this breaks standard profiling and debug flows.
libpmemobj-cpp is header-only library, so there is no need for debug packages.
> Have you already run fedora-review and addressed the reported issues?
No, not yet. I'm working on that.
> Is there a plan or list of dependencies identified before PMDK can be built
> on other architectures? I would file bugzilla's for those requirements as
> recommended here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/
> Guidelines#Architecture_Support
>
> ...and then reference them in the spec file.
PMDK spec already has the list of bugs (#1340634, #1340635, #1340636,
#1340637). Do I have to copy this list here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
