https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651397



--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Luis Segundo from comment #2)
> hello Ankur the spec look good, just a small change

Thanks for the review, Luis!


> - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
>   are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
>   Note: These BR are not needed: gcc-c++
>   See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
> 
>  the "BuildRequires:  gcc-c++" can be remove.

I think this is a false positive. The guidelines are now on docs.fp.o, and this
link fedora-review gives does not point to anything related to such an issue
either. So maybe fedora review is not up to date? I'm not sure what it's
pointing to here:

g++ is necessary for this package, otherwise the build fails. Here is a scratch
build that shows this:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31014016

Even using "gcc" instead of "gcc-c++" fails since the build process cannot find
the g++ compiler:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31014100



Cheers,
Ankur

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to