https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688292

Jitka Plesnikova <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova <[email protected]> ---
Source file is ok
Summary is ok
License is ok
Description is ok
URL and Source0 are ok
All tests passed
BuildRequires are ok

$ rpm -qp --requires perl-Geo-Proj4-1.09-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c |
grep -v rpmlib
      1 libc.so.6()(64bit)
      1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 
      1 libperl.so.5.28()(64bit)
      1 libproj.so.13()(64bit) 
      1 libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
      1 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
      1 perl(base)
      1 perl(Carp)
      1 perl(DynaLoader)
      1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.1)
      1 perl(Scalar::Util)
      1 perl(strict)
      1 perl(vars)
      1 perl(warnings)
      1 rtld(GNU_HASH)
Binary requires are Ok.

$ rpm -qp --provides perl-Geo-Proj4-1.09-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c
      1 perl(Geo::Proj4) = 1.09
      1 perl-Geo-Proj4 = 1.09-1.fc31
      1 perl-Geo-Proj4(x86-64) = 1.09-1.fc31
Binary provides are Ok.

$ rpmlint ./perl-Geo-Proj4*
perl-Geo-Proj4.src: W: invalid-license Artistic
perl-Geo-Proj4.x86_64: W: invalid-license Artistic
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Rpmlint is ok

The package looks good.
Approved

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to