https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694366
Robert-André Mauchin <zebo...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |zebo...@gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebo...@gmail.com> ---
- Your package is noarch, you don't need this:
%global debug_package %{nil}
No debuginfo is gathered for noarch packages.
- Bump to 1.15.1, drop the patch that has been merged
- Consider using: %?python_enable_dependency_generator
to automatically generates Requires instead of listing them. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnablingPythonGenerators#How_To_Test
(enabled by default in F30)
- Please remove all the trailing spaces in your SPEC. Whatever editor you use
there should be an option to remove trailing spaces on save.
- Seems you don't have all Requires packaged yet:
DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: Error:
DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: Problem: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides python3.7dist(aspy.yaml)
needed by python3-pre-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.noarch
DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides
python3.7dist(importlib-metadata) needed by
python3-pre-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.noarch
DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides python3.7dist(cfgv) >=
1.4.0 needed by python3-pre-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.noarch
DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides python3.7dist(identify)
>= 1.0.0 needed by python3-pre-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.noarch
- Run the tests with pytest
- Simply use:
Source0: %{url}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 170 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/python-pre-commit/review-python-pre-
commit/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: Mock build failed
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_use_rpmlint
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in
SRPM.-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-pre-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
python-pre-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.src.rpm
python3-pre-commit.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/bin/pre-commit-validate-config
python3-pre-commit.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pre-commit
python3-pre-commit.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
pre-commit-validate-config
python3-pre-commit.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
pre-commit-validate-manifest
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
